应用光学, 2014, 35 (1): 163, 网络出版: 2014-01-17   

106 μm激光对CCD、CMOS相机饱和干扰效果对比研究

Comparative study on saturation effect of 106 μm laser jamming CCD and CMOS cameras
作者单位
中国人民解放军63891部队,河南 洛阳 471003
摘要
为了对比激光对CCD、CMOS两种图像传感器的干扰效果,利用106 μm高重频激光开展了对CCD、CMOS两种相机的饱和干扰实验研究,分析了两种相机在干扰有效面积、饱和干扰面积、干扰前后图像相关度等与激光入射功率之间的关系。实验结果表明:CMOS相机达到单元像素饱和的激光功率阈值是CCD相机的20倍;要达到相同的干扰有效面积,所需的激光功率CMOS相机要大于CCD相机10倍~100倍;要达到相同的饱和像元数,所需的激光功率CMOS相机比CCD相机约大10倍~60倍。因此,CMOS相机要比CCD相机具有更好的抗106 μm激光干扰能力。
Abstract
To compare the jamming effect of laser on charged-coupled device (CCD) and complementary metal-oxide semiconductor (CMOS) imagers, jamming experiments with the wavelength of the 106 μm high-repetition-rate laser were conducted. The relationships of the two cameras laser incident power with the jamming effective area, saturated pixel number and the imaging correlation were analyzed individually. The experiment results show that the laser power threshold of one pixel saturation of CMOS camera is 20 times than CCD camera; in order to reach the same jamming effective area, the laser power of CMOS camera is 10~100 times higher than the CCD camera; and to reach the same saturation pixel, the laser power of CMOS camera is 10~60 times higher than the CCD camera. Therefore, the CMOS camera is better than CCD camera on the anti-jamming of the 106μm laser.

邵铭, 张乐, 张雷雷, 柴国庆, 胡琥香. 106 μm激光对CCD、CMOS相机饱和干扰效果对比研究[J]. 应用光学, 2014, 35(1): 163. SHAO Ming, ZHANG Le, ZHANG Lei-lei, CHAI Guo-qing, HU Hu-xiang. Comparative study on saturation effect of 106 μm laser jamming CCD and CMOS cameras[J]. Journal of Applied Optics, 2014, 35(1): 163.

本文已被 9 篇论文引用
被引统计数据来源于中国光学期刊网
引用该论文: TXT   |   EndNote

相关论文

加载中...

关于本站 Cookie 的使用提示

中国光学期刊网使用基于 cookie 的技术来更好地为您提供各项服务,点击此处了解我们的隐私策略。 如您需继续使用本网站,请您授权我们使用本地 cookie 来保存部分信息。
全站搜索
您最值得信赖的光电行业旗舰网络服务平台!