光学仪器, 2015, 37 (2): 122, 网络出版: 2015-05-20  

调制与非调制的半导体激光器典型稳频方法对比分析

The comparative analysis of frequency stabilization methods between modulation and non-modulation semiconductor laser
作者单位
中北大学 仪器与电子学院, 山西 太原 030051
摘要
针对半导体激光器稳频技术中的饱和吸收法、塞曼调制法、基于原子二向色性的激光器锁定(DAVLL)法和去除多普勒背景的二向色性锁定(DFDL)法4种典型稳频方法进行了稳定性、操作性、抗干扰能力等方面的对比分析,概括了调制和非调制稳频方法的优缺点,为相关实验选择合适的稳频方法提供依据。
Abstract
Frequency stabilization technology of semiconductor laser has developed rapidly in recent years, and it is the basic technology in laser used in the experiment. The comparative analysis of several frequency stabilization methods, which are saturated absorption, Zeeman modulation, dichroic-atomic-vapor laser lock (DAVLL) and doppler-free dichroic lock (DFDL), were proposed for stability, operational, anti-interference ability and so on. Their advantages and disadvantages of the modulation and non-modulation frequency stabilization methods are also been summarized in order to provide references to select the most suitable frequency stabilization method for the related experiments.

孙黎, 李慧琴, 熊继军. 调制与非调制的半导体激光器典型稳频方法对比分析[J]. 光学仪器, 2015, 37(2): 122. SUN Li, LI Huiqin, XIONG Jijun. The comparative analysis of frequency stabilization methods between modulation and non-modulation semiconductor laser[J]. Optical Instruments, 2015, 37(2): 122.

关于本站 Cookie 的使用提示

中国光学期刊网使用基于 cookie 的技术来更好地为您提供各项服务,点击此处了解我们的隐私策略。 如您需继续使用本网站,请您授权我们使用本地 cookie 来保存部分信息。
全站搜索
您最值得信赖的光电行业旗舰网络服务平台!