光谱学与光谱分析, 2016, 36 (9): 2858, 网络出版: 2016-12-26  

LIF技术与PLS-DA算法联合辨识矿井涌水水源类型的研究

Research on the Source Identification of Mine Water Inrush Based on LIF Technology and PLS-DA Algorithm
作者单位
1 安徽理工大学电气与信息工程学院, 安徽 淮南 232001
2 矿山地质灾害防治与环境保护安徽省重点实验室, 安徽 淮南 232001
3 安徽理工大学地球与环境学院, 安徽 淮南 232001
摘要
快速的矿井涌水水源辨识对于矿井的水灾预警及灾后救援意义重大。 常规方法使用离子浓度做为判别因子, 耗时过长, 因此提出一种激光诱导荧光光谱(LIF)技术与偏最小二乘判别分析(PLS-DA)算法联合快速辨识矿井涌水水源类型的方法。 实验使用405 nm激光对被测水体进行激发, 获取矿井5个不同含水层100组水样的荧光光谱, 根据光谱曲线特征, 对数据进行压缩处理, 获取合适的光谱数据。 每种水样使用15组共75组光谱数据作为建模集, 剩余的25组水样的光谱数据作为测试集。 为验证实验结果, 设计了簇类的独立软模式(SIMCA)算法与PLS-DA算法构建的实验模型进行对比。 实验发现矿井不同含水层水样的荧光光谱差异较大, 在不进行任何预处理的情况下, 以PLS模型为基础的PLS-DA算法较SIMCA算法的建模正确率高, 达到了100%, 其校正及验证结果与实际分类变量的相关系数均大于0.951, 校正集均方根误差(RMSECV)和验证集均方根误差(RMSEP)均小于0.123, 利用模型对测试集中五种水样样本的识别正确率均为100%。
Abstract
Rapid source identification of mine water inrush has great significance for early warning and rescuing after the mine water inrush. Conventional method taking the concentration of ions as the discriminant factor takes such a long time that a method of rapid source identification of mine water inrush is in urgent need. This method is combined with Laser induced fluorescence (LIF) technology and Partial Least Squares-Discriminant Analysis (PLS-DA) algorithm. In the experiment, 405 nm laser was used to excite the water and 100 groups of fluorescence spectrum from 5 different aquifer of the mine were obtained. According to the spectra curve features, the data was compressed to obtain proper spectral data. 15 groups of spectrum of each water inrush samples were applied, with a total of 75 groups of spectrum as the prediction set while the rest of 25 groups of spectrum as the test set. To verify the experimental result, an experimental model was built with soft independent modeling of class analogy (SIMCA) to compare with PLS-DA. The result shows that the fluorescence spectra of different aquifer water samples is of great difference, without any pre-treatment, the PLS-DA algorithm based on the PLS model has higher modeling accuracy compared with SIMCA algorithm, which reaches to 100%, the validation results and the correlation of separation of variables are both more than 0.951, the RMSECV and RMSEP are both less than 0.123, using the model to identify the 5 water samples of test set, the accuracy are up to 100%.

闫鹏程, 周孟然, 刘启蒙, 王瑞, 刘骏. LIF技术与PLS-DA算法联合辨识矿井涌水水源类型的研究[J]. 光谱学与光谱分析, 2016, 36(9): 2858. YAN Peng-cheng, ZHOU Meng-ran, LIU Qi-meng, WANG Rui, LIU Jun. Research on the Source Identification of Mine Water Inrush Based on LIF Technology and PLS-DA Algorithm[J]. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 2016, 36(9): 2858.

关于本站 Cookie 的使用提示

中国光学期刊网使用基于 cookie 的技术来更好地为您提供各项服务,点击此处了解我们的隐私策略。 如您需继续使用本网站,请您授权我们使用本地 cookie 来保存部分信息。
全站搜索
您最值得信赖的光电行业旗舰网络服务平台!