光学仪器, 2019, 41 (4): 42, 网络出版: 2019-11-05  

相位恢复算法在仿真与实验上的研究

Research on simulation and experiment of phase retrieval algorithm
作者单位
上海理工大学光电信息与计算机工程学院, 上海 200093
摘要
相位恢复算法一直存在着精确度不高, 收敛速度慢甚至停滞不前等问题。将基于光强传输方程 (TIE)法与 G-S迭代算法混合提高了相位恢复的精确度, 梯度算法的提出加大了迭代步长, 使得收敛速度加快。采用 GS-TIE算法和振幅加成梯度算法分别从仿真和实验的角度去比较分析恢复的效果。通过对二维图像仿真得出, 振幅加成梯度算法在收敛速度上是 GS-TIE迭代算法的 3倍, 精确度是 GS-TIE迭代算法的 10倍。从实验结果得知, GS-TIE恢复的相位清晰可见, 轮廓明显, 在边缘处过度均匀, 而振幅加成梯度算法相对比较模糊, 在轮廓边缘处过度不均匀, 悬差较大。
Abstract
The phase retrieval algorithm has always had some questions such as low precision, long convergence time and even stagnation. Based on the transport of intension equation (TIE)-Gerchberg-Saxton (GS) iteration hybrid algorithm improves the precision of phase retrieval, and gradient algorithm increases the iteration step and accelerates the convergence speed. This paper compares and analyses the GS-TIE algorithm and amplitude addition gradient algorithm retrieval effect from the perspective of simulation and experiment for GS-TIE algorithm and amplitude addition gradient algorithm. Based on the 2D images simulation for the comparison of two phase retrieval algorithms, it proves that the convergence speed of the algorithm is three times that of GS-TIE iteration algorithm, the accuracy of the algorithm is better than GS-TIE iteration algorithm, and the accuracy is ten times better than GS-TIE iteration algorithm. The experimental results show that GS-TIE algorithm retrieval phase is clearly visible, the contour is obvious, and it is excessively uniform at the edge, while the amplitude addition gradient algorithm is relatively fuzzy, and it is excessively uneven at the edge of the contour and has a large suspension.

刘韵杰, 于颖, 王海凤. 相位恢复算法在仿真与实验上的研究[J]. 光学仪器, 2019, 41(4): 42. LIU Yunjie, YU Ying, WANG Haifeng. Research on simulation and experiment of phase retrieval algorithm[J]. Optical Instruments, 2019, 41(4): 42.

关于本站 Cookie 的使用提示

中国光学期刊网使用基于 cookie 的技术来更好地为您提供各项服务,点击此处了解我们的隐私策略。 如您需继续使用本网站,请您授权我们使用本地 cookie 来保存部分信息。
全站搜索
您最值得信赖的光电行业旗舰网络服务平台!