Chinese Optics Letters, 2018, 16 (4): 040604, Published Online: Jul. 12, 2018
SER estimation method for 56 GBaud PAM-4 transmission system
Figures & Tables
Fig. 2. Contour plots at (a) − 4.41 dBm , (b) − 5.06 dBm , (c) − 5.71 dBm , (d) − 6.36 dBm , (e) − 7.01 dBm , and (f) − 7.66 dBm for 30 GHz. (g) Contour lines at Z = 0 for different ROPs at 30 GHz.
Fig. 3. Contour lines at Z = 0 for different ROPs at (a) 18 GHz, (b) 19 GHz, (c) 20 GHz, and (d) 25 GHz.
Fig. 4. (a) SER versus ROPs at different bandwidths. (b) Contour plot at − 5.71 dBm for 18, 19, 20, 25, and 30 GHz. (c) P versus ROPs for 18, 19, 20, 25, and 30 GHz. (d) P versus receiver bandwidths at − 4.41 , − 5.06 , − 5.71 , − 6.36 , and − 7.01 dBm .(e) Comparison among SER C , SER Q , and SER GGD as a function of ROPs at 30 GHz. (f) SER verus P for 18, 19, 20, 25, and 30 GHz at 10 km.
Fig. 5. (a) Eye-diagram and (b) probability distribution function of the received signal of PAM-4 at − 7.66 dBm at 30 GHz.
Fig. 7. Contour lines at Z = 0 for − 4 , − 5 , − 6 , − 7 . (a) BtB. (b) 10 km. (c) SER versus ROPs for BtB and 10 km. (d) P versus ROPs at BtB and 10 km. (e) SER versus P at BtB and 10 km.
Table1. Simulation Parameters
|
Aadil Raza, Kangping Zhong, Salman Ghafoor, Saeed Iqbal, Muhammad Adeel, Shahid Habib, Muhammad Fasih Uddin Butt, Chao Lu. SER estimation method for 56 GBaud PAM-4 transmission system[J]. Chinese Optics Letters, 2018, 16(4): 040604.