影响激光诱导等离子体稳定性的因素研究

王琦; 陈兴龙; 王静鸽; 付洪波; 宋乐; 吴跃进; 董凤忠

doi:doi:10.3788/aos201434.0630002

光学学报, 2014, 34 (6): 0630002, 网络出版: 2014-04-29

影响激光诱导等离子体稳定性的因素研究

Research on Factors Affecting the Stability of Laser-Induced Plasmas

论文大纲

王琦 ^1,*陈兴龙 ²王静鸽 ²付洪波 ²宋乐 ¹吴跃进 ¹董凤忠 ²

作者单位

¹ 中国科学院合肥物质科学研究院技术生物与农业工程研究所, 安徽合肥 230031

² 中国科学院安徽光学精密机械研究所, 安徽合肥 230031

摘要

采用1064 nm的激光对炉渣样品进行烧蚀，分析了影响炉渣中信号稳定性的一些因素。激光能量在小范围波动（±2%）对信号的稳定性影响很小，参考激光能量和光谱信号强度无明显关系。当激光频率降低至4 Hz以下时，信号的相对标准偏差下降至10%左右。当激光聚焦位置位于样品表面下3 mm时信号强度和稳定性最优。熔渣样品信号的稳定性高于粉渣样品，不同渣系的炉渣的稳定性也不相同。对于原子线，不同点烧蚀的稳定性远远优于单点烧蚀稳定性，而对于离子谱线，两种不同的烧蚀稳定性差别不大。

Abstract

The slag sample is ablated by laser with the wavelength of 1064 nm. Some factors which influence the stability of signal are analyzed. The fluctuation of energy within ±2% has an unapparent influence on the stability of signal. The energy of reference laser has an unclear relationship with the intensity of signal spectrum. When the laser frequency is reduced to 4 Hz, the relative standard deviation of signal falls to about 10%. It is found that the intensity and stability of signal are the best when laser focus position is 3 mm below the surface of sample. It is demonstrated that the signals of smelt slag samples have better stabilities than thoes of grinded slag samples and different kinds of slags also have different signal stabilities. It is shown that the stability of signal from different ablated spots is better than that of the signal from the same ablated spot for atom lines, but there is no obvious distinction for ion lines.

参考文献

[1] G Hubmer, R Kitaberger, K Morwald. Application of LIBS to the in-line process control of liquid high-alloy steel under pressure [J]. Ana Bioanal Chem, 2006, 385(2): 219-224.

[2] J Gruber, J Heitz, N Arnold, et al.. In situ analysis of metal melts in metallurgic vacuum devices by laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy [J]. Appl Spectrosc, 2004, 58(4): 457-462.

[3] 董美蓉, 陆继东, 李军, 等. 液相和固相钢铁的激光诱导击穿光谱特性[J]. 光学学报, 2011, 31(1): 0130002.

Dong Meirong, Lu Jidong, Li Jun, et al.. Properties of laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy between liquid steel and solid steel [J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2011, 31(1): 0130002.

[4] J Gruber, J Heitz, H Strasser, et al.. Rapid in-situ analysis of liquid steel by laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy [J]. Spectrochimica Acta Part B, 2001, 56(6): 685-693.

[5] 陈兴龙, 董凤忠, 王琦. 自由定标激光诱导击穿光谱技术在炉渣成分定量分析中的应用[J]. 光谱学与光谱分析, 2011, 31(12): 3289-3293.

Chen Xinglong, Dong Fengzhong, Wang Qi. Quantitative analysis of slag by calibration-free laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy [J]. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 2011, 31(12): 3289-3293.

[6] P L Garcia, J M Vadillo, J J Laserna. Real-time monitoring of high-temperature corrosion in stainless steels by open-path laser-induced plasma spectrometry [J]. Appl Spectrosc, 2004, 58(11): 1347-1352.

[7] Edilene C Ferreira, Eveline A Menezes, Wladiana O Matos, et al.. Determination of Ca in breakfast cereals by laser induced breakdown spectroscopy [J]. Food Control, 2010, 21(10): 1327-1330.

[8] Lidiane Cristina Nunes, Gilmare Antnia da Silva, Lilian Cristina Trevizan, et al.. Simultaneous optimization by neuro-genetic approach for analysis of plant materials by laser induced breakdown spectroscopy [J]. Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy, 2009, 64(6): 565-572.

[9] L Lanza Nina, C Wiens Roger, M Clegg Samuel, et al.. Calibrating the ChemCam laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy instrument for carbonate minerals on mars [J]. Appl Opt, 2010, 49(13): C211-C217.

[10] 王春龙, 刘建国, 赵南京, 等. 基于支持向量机回归的水体重金属激光诱导击穿光谱定量分析研究[J]. 光学学报, 2013, 33(3): 0330002.

Wang Chunlong, Liu Jianguo, Zhao Nanjing, et al.. Quantitative analysis of laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy of heavy metals in water based on support-vector-machine regression [J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2013, 33(3): 0330002.

[11] G Arca, A Ciucci, V Pal leschi, et al.. Trace element analysis in water by the laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy technique [J]. Appl Spectrosc, 1997, 51(8): 1102-1105.

[12] L Dudragne, P Adam, J Amouroux. Time-resolved laser induced breakdown spectroscopy: application for qualitative and quantitative detect ion of fluorine, chlorine, sulfur, and carbon in air [J]. Appl Spectrosc, 1998, 52(10): 1321-1327.

[13] 刘立拓, 刘建国, 赵南京, 等. 窗口可变滑动相关分析方法在激光诱导击穿光谱谱线自动识别中的应用[J]. 光学学报, 2012, 32(10): 1030002.

Liu Lituo, Liu Jianguo, Zhao Nanjing, et al.. Application of correlative analysis with an alterable and scannable window in spectral automatic recognition laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy [J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2012, 32(10): 1030002.

[14] F Capitelli, F Colao, M R Provenzano, et al.. Determination of heavy metals in soils by laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy [J]. Geoderma, 2002, 106(1): 45-62.

[15] P Fichet, M Tabarant, B Salle, et al.. Comparisons between LIBS and ICP/ OES [J]. Anal Bioanal Chem, 2006, 385(2): 338-344.

[16] Rosalie A Multari, Leeann E Foster, David A Cremers. Effect of sampling geometry on elemental emissions in laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy [J]. Appl Spectrosc, 1996, 50(12): 1483-1499.

[17] B C Castle, K Talabardon, B W Smith, et al.. Variables influencing the precision of laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy measurements [J]. Appl Spectrosc, 1997, 52(5): 649-657.

[18] Jorge E Carranza, Emily Gibb, Ben W Smith, et al.. Comparison of nonintensified and intensified CCD detectors for laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy [J]. Appl Opt, 2003, 42(30): 6016-6021.

[19] 胡振华, 张巧, 丁蕾, 等. 液体射流双脉冲激光诱导击穿Ca等离子体温度和电子数密度研究[J]. 光学学报, 2013, 33(4): 0430004.

Hu Zhenhua, Zhang Qiao, Ding Lei, et al.. Temperature and electron number density of liquid jet double-pulse laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy Ca plasma [J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2013, 33(4): 0430004.

[20] J Dowden, P Kapadia, N Postacioglu. An analysis of the laser-plasma interaction in laser keyhole welding [J]. J Phys D: Appl Phys, 1989, 22(6): 741-749.

王琦, 陈兴龙, 王静鸽, 付洪波, 宋乐, 吴跃进, 董凤忠. 影响激光诱导等离子体稳定性的因素研究[J]. 光学学报, 2014, 34(6): 0630002. Wang Qi, Chen Xinglong, Wang Jingge, Fu Hongbo, Song Le, Wu Yuejin, Dong Fengzhong. Research on Factors Affecting the Stability of Laser-Induced Plasmas[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2014, 34(6): 0630002.

影响激光诱导等离子体稳定性的因素研究

关于本站 Cookie 的使用提示

全站搜索

影响激光诱导等离子体稳定性的因素研究

相关论文

相关资讯

关于本站 Cookie 的使用提示

全站搜索