Photonics Research, 2018, 6 (3): 03000149, Published Online: Jul. 10, 2018
Numerical analysis of end-fire coupling of surface plasmon polaritons in a metal-insulator-metal waveguide using a simple photoplastic connector Download: 790次
Figures & Tables
Fig. 1. Spatial geometry of the photoplastic connector: (a) view from the PH; (b) view from the excitation area.
Fig. 2. Schematic representation of the connector design: (a) view from the excitation area, (b) view from the PH, and (c) longitudinal view. d 1 is a diameter of the optical fiber, and thus the inner diameter of the tumbler; d 2 is the external diameter of the tumbler, and thus the diameter of the Al screen; a and u are the width and height of the PH, respectively; L 1 is the length of the optical fiber; L 2 is the length of the tumbler; L 3 is the thickness of the Al screen; L 4 is the distance between the optical fiber and Al screen, that is, the thickness of the tumbler bottom; L 5 is the length of the MIM waveguide; b is the thickness of the MIM waveguide dielectric layer; t is the thickness of the MIM waveguide’s metallic coatings.
Fig. 3. Contour plot and profiles of the absolute value of the electric field of the fundamental propagation LP 01 (HE 11 ) mode of a circular dielectric waveguide; white dashed circle corresponds to outer edge of the optical fiber core; red dashed lines correspond to the PH dimension along the x axis; a.u., arbitrary units.
Fig. 4. Electric field amplitude (E x ) profile of the fundamental symmetric plasmon quasi-TM 00 mode; b = 200 nm , t = 50 nm ; red dashed lines correspond to the PH dimension along the x axis; black dashed line corresponds to the | E | profile of the fundamental propagation LP 01 (HE 11 ) mode of a circular dielectric waveguide along the x axis from Fig. 3 .
Fig. 5. Dependence of c eff _ 1 and power reflection coefficient | R 1 | 2 on the Al screen thickness L 3 ; d 1 = 1000 nm , d 2 = 1200 nm , L 1 = 500 nm , L 2 = 400 nm , L 4 = 100 nm , a = 500 nm , u = 200 nm .
Fig. 6. Dependence of c eff _ 1 and | R 1 | 2 on the tumbler bottom thickness L 4 ; d 1 = 1000 nm , d 2 = 1200 nm , L 1 = 500 nm , L 2 = 400 nm , L 3 = 50 nm , a = 500 nm , u = 200 nm .
Fig. 7. Cross-sectional view of the electric field and energy flux in the structure: (a) x component of the electric field; (b) absolute value of the electric field; (c) z component of the Poynting vector. d 1 = 1000 nm , d 2 = 1200 nm , L 1 = 500 nm , L 2 = 400 nm , L 3 = 50 nm , L 4 = 100 nm , a = 500 nm , u = 200 nm ; a.u., arbitrary units.
Fig. 8. Dependence of c eff _ 2 on the Al screen thickness L 3 ; d 1 = 1000 nm , d 2 = 1200 nm , L 1 = 500 nm , L 2 = 400 nm , L 3 = 50 nm , L 4 = 100 nm , L 5 = 1000 nm , a = 500 nm , u = 200 nm , b = 200 nm , t = 50 nm .
Fig. 9. Cross-sectional view of the electric field and energy flux in the structure with the MIM waveguide: (a) x component of the electric field; (b) absolute value of the electric field; (c) z component of the Poynting vector. d 1 = 1000 nm , d 2 = 1200 nm , L 1 = 500 nm , L 2 = 400 nm , L 3 = 50 nm , L 4 = 100 nm , L 5 = 1000 nm , a = 500 nm , u = 200 nm , b = 200 nm , t = 50 nm ; a.u., arbitrary units.
Yevhenii M. Morozov, Anatoliy S. Lapchuk, Ming-Lei Fu, Andriy A. Kryuchyn, Hao-Ran Huang, Zi-Chun Le. Numerical analysis of end-fire coupling of surface plasmon polaritons in a metal-insulator-metal waveguide using a simple photoplastic connector[J]. Photonics Research, 2018, 6(3): 03000149.